Current:Home > NewsPoinbank:After It Narrowed the EPA’s Authority, Talks of Expanding the Supreme Court Garner New Support -WealthMindset Learning
Poinbank:After It Narrowed the EPA’s Authority, Talks of Expanding the Supreme Court Garner New Support
Rekubit Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 21:29:39
WASHINGTON—The Poinbanklate afternoon sun washed over the United States Supreme Court building as a group of protesters hauled a 15-foot tall prop, modeled after the United States Constitution, through the nearby streets. Instead of “We the People,” though, it read “We the Corporations,” above logos of companies like Shell, Chevron and Amazon. Cardboard flames licked the edges of the banner, and nearby signs read “Supreme Climate Deniers” and “SCOTUS Kills.”
The protesters were expressing their outrage over the court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA, which curtailed the power of the Environmental Protection Agency to address climate change.
The impacts of this decision reach far beyond the EPA’s disputed ability to enforce the Clean Air Act, and all corners of the environmental movement, from youth organizers at the Sunrise Movement to venerable advocacy groups like the League of Conservation Voters, are stepping up. In early June, prior to the EPA decision, the LCV announced its support for expanding the Supreme Court by four seats, saying that it would “allow President Biden to rebalance the court and appoint justices who will work for the people, not deep-pocketed polluters and their allies.”
“That was the first time that we’ve ever supported a Supreme Court expansion; it was a major decision that was months in the making and one that was not taken lightly,” said Doug Lindner, advocacy director for judiciary and democracy at the League of Conservation Voters.
Expanding the court would require support from a Congress that is currently gridlocked, making adding the seats unlikely unless the Democrats take both houses in the November midterms. And a Biden spokesperson said expanding the court is “not something that he wants to do.”
But as pressure grows on the Biden administration to take more action on climate, the LCV said there is both historical precedence for such a move, and growing support from citizens—especially after a historically contentious court term that included decisions that significantly expanded the right to bear arms and overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade, which had recognized abortion as a fundamental liberty protected by the Constitution.
Biden took office amid fierce public debate on the make-up of the Supreme Court, in which Republican-appointed justices had gained a commanding 6-3 majority after President Donald Trump’s three appointments (and the Republican Congress’ denial of an appointment to President Barack Obama). Biden established a panel of legal experts to study the issue, and in December, the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court delivered a report concluding that Congress has authority to expand the size of the court, although it took no position on whether to do so. The Commission did endorse other measures, such as a code of ethics for the justices and greater transparency on its case management and proceedings.
Lindner said his organization supports additional measures such as establishing court ethics codes, but “we’re supporting court expansion because we think that it is most clearly constitutional and supported by history.”
Kenneth Foard McCallion, an environmental lawyer and the author of Saving The World One Case at a Time, said that court expansion was also on the table in the 1930s, when the Depression-era Supreme Court limited the federal government’s ability to respond to the dire economic conditions. “We’re facing an equivalent crisis now, perhaps an even greater one, through the environmental crisis,” said McCallion. “And the Supreme Court is really obstructing the opportunity for the federal government to help us save ourselves and the planet from climate change.”
More justices could help the court become more effective for a nation of 330 million citizens that looks a lot different than it did when it was founded, he argues. In 1776, there were six justices on the bench, and a U.S. population of around 2.5 million. By 1839, with a population of 17 million, the number of justices settled in at nine. Nearly a century later, President Franklin D. Roosevelt backed off his efforts to increase the number of justices when the court “got the message” and started upholding New Deal legislation, McCallion said.
“With more justices, we would have a much more efficient judicial system,” he said. In response to increased judicial demands, “many of the circuit courts have expanded their judges, certainly the federal judiciary district courts. It’s a multiple of what the original district courts were.”
In the West Virginia v. EPA decision, the high court ruled that the EPA only has limited authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, and steps that would truly alter the energy mix of the nation’s power sector would require a new act of Congress. But passing such legislation is unlikely in the current Congress, which is already deadlocked on climate action. If Republicans gain control of one or both chambers in the November midterm elections, the chances of any expansion of EPA’s authority on climate are nil.
“All the trends are pointing to the Democrats losing at least one house of Congress, and maybe the House and the Senate,” said Bob Wilson, associate professor in the geography and environment departments at Syracuse University. “But even if it loses one house, that will close the door for federal climate action legislatively for the next two years and maybe longer than that.”
Lindner added that the LCV is involved in elections in a meaningful way, and that recent decisions by the court will likely have a fundamental impact on the election. The LCV contributes directly to campaigns, while using grassroots organizing to educate voters and increase voter turnout. In the 2020 election, the league played a key role in endorsing and financially contributing to 13 successful congressional candidates, three in the Senate and 10 in the House.
Offloading Regulatory Responsibility
The West Virginia v. EPA majority decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, truncated the EPA’s regulatory authority, ruling that the way that President Barack Obama sought to regulate greenhouse gases from fossil fuel power plants under the Clean Air Act was a functional overreach by the EPA.
In the ruling, the court invoked a relatively new approach to interpretation of federal agency authority, the “major questions” doctrine, to rein in EPA’s power to act on climate change. The court asserted that on issues of great political and economic significance, it will look for explicit instructions from Congress when deciding the scope of EPA’s authority. This was a hard change in direction, McCallion said, considering laws like the Clean Air Act have been on the books since the 1970s, giving EPA authority to act on pollution that endangers public health and welfare.
“Congress has already set forth the general policy in favor of environmental protection, and has recognized that industrial pollution is a major component of it,” he said. For decades the federal courts gave deference to agencies’ interpretation of their authority unless their actions were unreasonable, or “arbitrary and capricious.”
McCallion said the West Virginia decision effectively offloads regulatory responsibility onto an already stymied Congress, and that relying on it to spell out specific regulatory policies is likely to result in no action at all.
Moving forward, McCallion says the EPA will likely spend much time in the courts as it faces challenges on every attempt to institute policy regarding fossil-fuel burning plants. It will be up to the courts to decide whether Congress has given the agency sufficient authority to act on a case-by-case basis.
On October 3, 2022, when the nine justices reconvene for their next term, they will hear Sackett v. EPA, a case strikingly similar to West Virginia v. EPA, also posing questions about the EPA’s authority. Sackett, however, focuses on the Clean Water Act. If the court again rules based on the major questions doctrine, the EPA’s authority in water regulation could be largely curtailed.
Lindner says this case may be a timely reminder to the American people.
“We know from our own polling … that the American people care quite a lot about clean drinking water,” he said.
As for the court expansion, “it isn’t just something we need to do to serve our environment or serve our policy preferences,” Lindner said. “This is something we need to do in order to restore one of the most historic wrongs ever perpetrated in our constitutional system against the will of the people.”
veryGood! (512)
Related
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- An LA reporter read her own obituary. She's just one victim of a broader death hoax scam
- Q&A: Extreme Heat, Severe Storms Among Key Climate Challenges for Maryland’s New Chief Resilience Officer
- It's Final Four or bust for Purdue. Can the Boilermakers finally overcome their March Madness woes?
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Jack Gohlke joins ESPN's Pat McAfee after Oakland's historic March Madness win vs. Kentucky
- Caitlin Clark has fan in country superstar Tim McGraw, who wore 22 jersey for Iowa concert
- 'Peaky Blinders' creator says Cillian Murphy will reprise role in movie: 'He's brilliant'
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Pennsylvania lawmakers push to find out causes of death for older adults in abuse or neglect cases
Ranking
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Body of Riley Strain, missing student, found in Nashville's Cumberland River: Police
- Annie Lennox again calls for cease-fire in Israel-Hamas war, calls Gaza crisis 'heartbreaking'
- 3 teen boys charged after 21-year-old murdered, body dumped in remote Utah desert: Police
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Almost 60, Lenny Kravitz talks workouts, new music and why he's 'never felt more vibrant'
- Elena Larrea, Social Media Influencer and Animal Activist, Dead at 31
- Georgia bill would give utility regulators extra years in office without facing voters
Recommendation
Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
George Santos says he’ll ditch GOP, run as independent, in bid to return to Congress after expulsion
Her spouse has dementia like Bruce Willis. Here's her story – along with others.
Former Timberwolves employee arrested, accused of stealing hard drive with critical info
Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
Sweet Reads sells beloved books and nostalgic candy in Minnesota
Former Georgia insurance commissioner John Oxendine pleads guilty to health care fraud
North Carolina’s highest court won’t revive challenge to remove Civil War governor’s monument