Current:Home > MyFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -WealthMindset Learning
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 15:37:58
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (4982)
Related
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Rachel Hollis Reflects on Unbelievably Intense 4 Months After Ex-Husband Dave Hollis' Death
- Video: In New York’s Empty Streets, Lessons for Climate Change in the Response to Covid-19
- Kinder Morgan Cancels Fracked Liquids Pipeline Plan, and Pursues Another
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Go Inside Paige DeSorbo's Closet Packed With Hidden Gems From Craig Conover
- Solar Power Taking Hold in Nigeria, One Mobile Phone at a Time
- 6 Ways Andrew Wheeler Could Reshape Climate Policy as EPA’s New Leader
- Trump's 'stop
- Orlando Bloom's Shirtless Style Leaves Katy Perry Walking on Air
Ranking
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Video: In New York’s Empty Streets, Lessons for Climate Change in the Response to Covid-19
- Coal Ash Is Contaminating Groundwater in at least 22 States, Utility Reports Show
- Dolphins use baby talk when communicating with calves, study finds
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- 17 Vacation Must-Haves Under $50 From UnSun Cosmetics, Sunnylife, Viski & More
- Queer Eye's Tan France Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Husband Rob France
- 4 volunteers just entered a virtual Mars made by NASA. They won't come back for one year.
Recommendation
Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
For the intersex community, 'Every Body' exists on a spectrum
Coal’s Decline Not Hurting Power Grid Reliability, Study Says
Mountaintop Mining Is Destroying More Land for Less Coal, Study Finds
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Wyoming Bill Would All But Outlaw Clean Energy by Preventing Utilities From Using It
Russia's ruble drops to 14-month low after rebellion challenges Putin's leadership
Rent is falling across the U.S. for the first time since 2020